In eight years, Utah has quietly reduced homelessness by 78 percent, and is on track to end homelessness by 2015.
How did Utah accomplish this? Simple. Utah solved homelessness by giving people homes.
In 2005, Utah figured out that the annual cost of E.R. visits and jail
stays for homeless people was about $16,670 per person, compared to
$11,000 to provide each homeless person with an apartment and a social
worker. So, the state began giving away apartments, with no strings
attached. Each participant in Utah’s Housing First program also gets a
caseworker to help them become self-sufficient, but they keep the
apartment even if they fail. The program has been so successful that
other states are hoping to achieve similar results with programs modeled
on Utah’s.
It sounds like Utah borrowed a page from Homes Not Handcuffs,
the 2009 report by The National Law Center on Homelessness &
Poverty and The National Coalition for the Homeless. Using a 2004 survey
and anecdotal evidence from activists, the report concluded that
permanent housing for the homeless is cheaper than criminalization.
Housing is not only more human, it’s economical.
[via roy]
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
85 rich = 3.5 billion poor
An Oxfam briefing
has noted that the richest 85 people in the world control the same
amount of wealth as the bottom half of the world’s population. That
means about seven dozen people (the number of people it would take to
crowd one subway-car) have as much of the world’s wealth as 3.5 billion people put together.
About
half of the world’s wealth is owned by the richest 1% of the population
and that wealth (all $110 trillion of it) is 65 times the wealth of the
bottom half of the population.
***
It’s a counterintuitive idea to
say the least, but it costs a lot to be poor in the United States. When
money is at its tightest, cost-saving choices are often impossible to
make, digging impoverished Americans deeper and deeper into the pit of
day-by-day living.
A
common narrative in today’s political arena is that the nation’s least
fortunate only need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps – that
they’re just not working hard enough. What often goes unnoticed,
however, are the overwhelming barriers that those living below the
poverty line face on a daily basis.
Saturday, January 11, 2014
marijuana legal in Colorado
Long lines and blustery winter weather greeted Colorado marijuana
shoppers testing the nation's first legal recreational pot shops
Wednesday.
It was hard to tell from talking to the shoppers, however, that they had waited hours in snow and frigid wind.
"It's a huge deal for me," said Andre Barr, a 34-year-old deliveryman
who drove from Niles, Mich., to be part of the legal weed experiment.
"This wait is nothing."
The world was watching as Colorado unveiled the modern world's first
fully legal marijuana industry — no doctor's note required (as in 18
states and Washington, D.C.) and no unregulated production of the drug
(as in the Netherlands). Uruguay has fully legalized pot but hasn't yet
set up its system.
Colorado had 24 shops open Wednesday, most of them in Denver, and aside
from long lines and sporadic reports of shoppers cited for smoking pot
in public, there were few problems.
"Everything's gone pretty smoothly," said Barbara Brohl, Colorado's top
marijuana regulator as head of the Department of Revenue.
The agency sent its new marijuana inspectors to recreational shops to
monitor sales and make sure sellers understood the state's new
marijuana-tracking inventory system meant to keep legal pot out of the
black market.
Denver International Airport erected signs warning travelers that they could not take marijuana home with them.
Keeping pot within Colorado's regulated system and within the state's
borders are among requirements the U.S. Department of Justice has laid
out to avoid a clampdown under federal law, which still outlaws the
drug.
The other state that has legalizes recreational pot, Washington, will
face the same restrictions when its retail shops start operating,
expected by late spring.
Monday, January 06, 2014
5 million left out of Medicaid expansion
Amber Sanchez, a San Francisco
cancer survivor, skipped visiting the gynecologist last year to check a
growth on her ovary because she was uninsured. This year, it’s at the
top of her New Year’s plans.
The difference: As of Jan. 1, the 27-year-old is eligible for California’s Medicaid expansion under Obamacare.
In Alabama, which rejected the expansion, Jefferica Poindexter isn’t so lucky. Dealing with high cholesterol, chronic sinus pain and a bad back, she depends on emergency rooms and nonprofit clinics -- when they can see her.
“I’ve tried to go the clinic,” said Poindexter, who is 63. “They’re already booked by the time they get to me.”
The women’s fates are the consequence of a political debate that’s divided the U.S. roughly along party lines: Democratic-led states have expanded Medicaid programs for the poor under the health law; most Republicans have refused. While the law’s online exchanges draw more scrutiny, it’s Medicaid that may determine the health of millions of Americans. The expansion is one of the twin pillars created by the law to supply medical care to the nation’s uninsured, complementing subsidies for private insurance.
Still, with only 25 states choosing to participate in the expansion, almost 5 million people will be left out, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, which studies health policy.
The difference: As of Jan. 1, the 27-year-old is eligible for California’s Medicaid expansion under Obamacare.
In Alabama, which rejected the expansion, Jefferica Poindexter isn’t so lucky. Dealing with high cholesterol, chronic sinus pain and a bad back, she depends on emergency rooms and nonprofit clinics -- when they can see her.
“I’ve tried to go the clinic,” said Poindexter, who is 63. “They’re already booked by the time they get to me.”
The women’s fates are the consequence of a political debate that’s divided the U.S. roughly along party lines: Democratic-led states have expanded Medicaid programs for the poor under the health law; most Republicans have refused. While the law’s online exchanges draw more scrutiny, it’s Medicaid that may determine the health of millions of Americans. The expansion is one of the twin pillars created by the law to supply medical care to the nation’s uninsured, complementing subsidies for private insurance.
Still, with only 25 states choosing to participate in the expansion, almost 5 million people will be left out, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, which studies health policy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)